Wife’s pubbing not cruelty, so no divorce: Bombay HC

Wife’s pubbing not cruelty, so no divorce: Bombay HC

MUMBAI: A Wadala resident’s bid to get divorce on grounds of cruelty by alleging that his wife, a businesswoman and resident of Pedder Road, liked to visit pubs and neglected their child and they had fights during their honeymoon failed in the Bombay high court.

A division bench of Justices Vijaya Kapse Tahilramani and Anil Menon refused to end the 20-year-old marriage of Seema and Rahul Sharma, though the couple has been living apart for 16 years now. “At best, evidence shows insuperable incompatibility between the parties falling short of cruelty. Be that as it may, irretrievable breakdown of marriage owing to severe and/or insuperable incompatibility does not amount to cruelty and as such no relief can be granted,” the judges said. The Sharmas had got married in 1994 and their son was born a couple of years later. In 1998, the couple began living separately, with the child opting to stay with his father. In 1999, Rahul filed for divorce alleging cruelty. The reasons he had listed included Seema being “rude, excessively socializing, going to pubs/discos, neglecting their son, throwing a vase and hot cup of tea and making false accusations”.

In 2012, a family court dismissed his plea for divorce, following which Rahul approached the high court.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s